Based on the legal argument brought by the retirees, the legislation Charles Barron introduced was unnecessary. I will also add that Charles Barron lost the primary because he has become out of touch with a large part of the community he was elected to serve and he's now attempting to blame its constituents for that loss by saying that the people who support him failed to come out and vote. He should accept that perhaps the people that he claims support him are just disillusioned with him and chose to stay home or that they are no longer in the majority. His "principled position" seems to be just a desperate attempt to get re-elected.
Please explain the inappropriate content below.
